Consciousness eclipsed: Jacques Loeb, Ivan P. Pavlov, and the rise of reductionistic biology after 1900
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 14 (1):219-230 (2005)
The life sciences in the 20th century were guided to a large extent by a reductionist program seeking to explain biological phenomena in terms of physics and chemistry. Two scientists who figured prominently in the establishment and dissemination of this program were Jacques Loeb in biology and Ivan P. Pavlov in psychological behaviorism. While neither succeeded in accounting for higher mental functions in physical-chemical terms, both adopted positions that reduced the problem of consciousness to the level of reflexes and associations. The intellectual origins of this view and the impediment to the study of consciousness as an object of inquiry in its own right that it may have imposed on peers, students, and those who followed is explored
|Keywords||*Animal Ethology *Behaviorism *Biology *History of Psychology Chemistry Pavlov (Ivan) Physics Scientists|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John B. Watson (1913). Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It. Psychological Review 20 (2):158-177.
Nikos K. Logothetis & Jeffrey D. Schall (1989). Neuronal Correlates of Subjective Visual Perception. Science 245:761-63.
B. Baars (2003). IP Pavlov and the Freedom Reflex. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (11):19-40.
Citations of this work BETA
Bernard J. Baars (2005). Subjective Experience is Probably Not Limited to Humans: The Evidence From Neurobiology and Behavior. Consciousness and Cognition 14 (1):7-21.
Louis M. Herman (2012). Body and Self in Dolphins. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):526-545.
Similar books and articles
Ute Deichmann (2009). Chemistry and the Engineering of Life Around 1900: Research and Reflections by Jacques Loeb. Biological Theory 4 (4):323-332.
Rein Vihalemm (2011). The Autonomy of Chemistry: Old and New Problems. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 13 (2):97-107.
Robert H. Wozniak (ed.) (1884). Theoretical Roots of Early Behaviourism: Functionalism, the Critique of Introspection, and the Nature and Evolution of Consciousness. Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
Ute Deichmann (2007). “Molecular” Versus “Colloidal”: Controversies in Biology and Biochemistry, 1900–1940. Bulletin for the History of Chemistry 32 (2):105-118.
Colin Allen & Marc Bekoff (1997). Species of Mind: The Philosophy and Biology of Cognitive Ethology. MIT Press.
Michel Weber & Anderson Weekes (eds.) (2010). Process Approaches to Consciousness in Psychology, Neuroscience, and Philosophy of Mind. State University of New York Press.
S. Wilcox & S. Katz (1981). A Direct Realist Alternative to the Traditional Conception of Memory. Behaviorism 9 (2):227-40.
George Windholz & P. A. Lamal (1991). Pavlov's View of the Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics as It Relates to Theses Concerning Scientific Change. Synthese 88 (1):97 - 111.
Jane Maienschein (2009). Controlling Life: From Jacques Loeb to Regenerative Medicine. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 42 (2):215 - 230.
Curt Fy (1959). Book Review:Experimental Psychology and Other Essays Ivan Petrovich Pavlov. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 26 (1):58-.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #227,428 of 1,934,534 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,193 of 1,934,534 )
How can I increase my downloads?