David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1987)
Powerful emotion and pursuit of self-interest have many times led people to break the law with the belief that they are doing so with sound moral reasons. This study is a comprehensive philosophical and legal analysis of the gray area in which the foundations of law and morality clash. This objective book views these oblique circumstances from two perspectives: that of the person who faces a possible conflict between the claims of morality and law and must choose whether or not to obey the penal code; and that of the people who make and uphold laws and must decide whether to treat someone with a moral claim to disobey differently from ordinary lawbreakers. In examining the extent of the obligations owed by citizens to their government, Greenawalt concentrates on the possible existence of a single source of obligation that reaches all citizens and all laws. He also discusses techniques of amelioration of punishment for conscientious lawbreakers, asking how far legal systems should go to accomodate individuals who break the law for reason of conscience. Drawing from numerous examples of conflicts between law and morality, Greenawalt illustrates in detail the positions and predicaments of potential lawbreakers and lawmakers alike.
|Keywords||Law Philosophy Law and ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$3.24 used (96% off) $31.67 new (55% off) $63.08 direct from Amazon (9% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||K230.G74.C66 1987|
|ISBN(s)||0195058240 0195041100 9780195058246|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Stephen P. Garvey (2013). Was Ellen Wronged? Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):185-216.
Eric W. Orts (1993). Positive Law and Systemic Legitimacy: A Comment on Hart and Habermas. Ratio Juris 6 (3):245-278.
Similar books and articles
Baudouin Dupret (2011). Adjudication in Action: An Ethnomethodology of Law, Morality and Justice. Ashgate.
Matthew H. Kramer (2008). Where Law and Morality Meet. Oxford University Press.
Robert Alexy (2002). The Argument From Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.
Elliot N. Dorff (2007). For the Love of God and People: A Philosophy of Jewish Law. The Jewish Publication Society.
Ellen Frankel, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2000). Natural Law and Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
John Arthur & William H. Shaw (eds.) (2010). Readings in the Philosophy of Law. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Leon Petrażycki (2010). Law and Morality. Translation Publishers.
M. B. E. Smith (1989). Review Essay / the Obligation to Obey the Law: Revision or Explanation? Criminal Justice Ethics 8 (2):60-70.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #78,424 of 1,139,993 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #92,708 of 1,139,993 )
How can I increase my downloads?