Dawkins and Latour. A Tale of Two Unlikely Fellows

In Arno Bammé (ed.), Yearbook 2005 of the Institute for Advanced Studies on Science, Technology and Society. Profil. pp. 99-124 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two popular, yet highly controversial concepts of non-human agency from two different fields of knowledge are compared in this essay: the theory of the Selfish Gene, introduced into neo-Darwinian evolutionary biology by Richard Dawkins, and Actor-Network Theory, as brought forward in Science & Technology Studies by Bruno Latour. It is argued that the two theories, despite all apparent differences, share key motifs and motivations when they try to forward knowledge in their respective fields by adopting a vocabulary that aims at metaphorical redescriptions of the origins of intentionality – in both senses: as purposefulness of action and as meaning.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Bruno Latour and actor-network-theory.Bozidar Filipovic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (1):129-149.
Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to the Actor-Network Theory.Bruno Latour - 2005 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Multistability and the Agency of Mundane Artifacts: from Speed Bumps to Subway Benches.Robert Rosenberger - 2014 - Human Studies 37 (3):369-392.
Bruno Latour, actor-networks, and the critique of critical sociology.Ivana Spasic - 2007 - Filozofija I Društvo 18 (2):43-72.
Ethics in Actor Networks, or: What Latour Could Learn from Darwin and Dewey.Katinka Waelbers & Philipp Dorstewitz - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1):23-40.
Delegating and distributing morality: Can we inscribe privacy protection in a machine? [REVIEW]Alison Adam - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):233-242.
What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design.Peter-Paul Verbeek - 2005 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
On Latour’s Social Theory and Theory of Society, and His Contribution to Saving the World.Gesa Lindemann - 2011 - Human Studies 34 (1):93-110.
Why science studies has never been critical of science: Some recent lessons on how to be a helpful nuisance and a harmless radical.Steve Fuller - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (1):5-32.
“My Attitude Made Me Do It”: Considering the Agency of Attitudes. [REVIEW]Mark van Vuuren & François Cooren - 2010 - Human Studies 33 (1):85-101.
Disassembling Actor-network Theory.Dave Elder-Vass - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (1):100-121.
The extended phenotype: a comparison with niche construction theory.David A. Wells - 2015 - Biology and Philosophy 30 (4):547-567.
Unnatural selection.James Miles - 1998 - Philosophy 73 (4):593-608.
Latour's greatest hits, reassembled: Review of Bruno Latour's Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. [REVIEW]Nicholas J. Rowland, Jan-Hendrik Passoth & Alexander B. Kinney - 2011 - Spontaneous Generations 5 (1):95-99.
An introduction to science and technology studies.Sergio Sismondo - 2004 - Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
357 (#53,590)

6 months
78 (#53,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hajo Greif
Warsaw University of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inquiries Into Truth And Interpretation.Donald Davidson - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
We have never been modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection.Charles Darwin - 1897 - New York: Heritage Press. Edited by George W. Davidson.
Anti-Latour.David Bloor - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1):81-112.

View all 8 references / Add more references