David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Monist 86 (3):501-515 (2003)
Peter Singer is responsible for having developed a powerful argument that apparently shows that most of us are far more immoral than we take ourselves to be. Many people follow a minimalist morality. They avoid killing, stealing, lying and cruelty, but feel no obligation to devote themselves to the well-being of everybody else. If we are unstintingly generous, constantly kind or untiring advocates for the prevention of cruelty, we take it that we are doing more morally than is strictly required. We commend those who give generously to foreign aid, but we do not look on those who fail to give us unthinking criminals or moral reprobates. Yet, if Singer's argument is cogent, our standard judgements are seriously askew. Those who fail to do what they can to alleviate the absolute poverty of the worst off in the world are not quite as bad as murders and thieves, for they do not intentionally act in such a way as to kill and deprive others of their rightful share. They are, however, about as bad as reckless drivers who act in a way which will cause death and destruction, without desiring that these predictable consequences of their actions should come about (Singer 1993, p. 228)
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sven Ove Hansson (2008). The Obligations of Philosophers. Theoria 74 (3):179-180.
Similar books and articles
G. Mellema (2003). Responsibility, Taint, and Ethical Distance in Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 47 (2):125 - 132.
Brook J. Sadler (2007). Collective Responsibility, Universalizability, and Social Practices. Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (3):486–503.
Harold J. White (1969). An Analysis of Hare's Application of the Thesis of Universalizability in His Moral Arguments. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):174-183.
Chris Bessemans (2012). Universalizability in Moral Judgments. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (4):397-404.
Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (1999). Responsibility. Cambridge University Press.
Virginia G. Maurer (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and the "Divided Corporate Self": The Case of Chiquita in Colombia. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):595 - 603.
Rebecca Saunders (2011). Keeping a Distance. Angelaki 16 (2):35 - 49.
Lawrence Pasternack (2003). Gambling Maxims and Their Universalizability. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):17-28.
Derek J. Morrow (2005). The Love 'Without Being' That Opens (to) Distance Part Two: From the Icon of Distance to the Distance of the Icon in Marion's Phenomenology of Love. Heythrop Journal 46 (4):493–511.
Roberto Festa (1986). A Measure for the Distance Between an Interval Hypothesis and the Truth. Synthese 67 (2):273 - 320.
John Hendry (1999). Universalizability and Reciprocity in International Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (3):405-420.
Henry S. Richardson (1999). Institutionally Divided Moral Responsibility. Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (02):218-.
Michael Ridge (2005). Universalizability for Collective Rational Agents: A Critique of Agentrelativism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):34–66.
Brian Ribeiro (2008). A Distance Theory of Humour. Think 6 (17/18):139-148.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads13 ( #127,469 of 1,102,094 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #24,869 of 1,102,094 )
How can I increase my downloads?