Ethical Discourse on the Use of Genetically Modified Crops: A Review of Academic Publications in the Fields of Ecology and Environmental Ethics
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):265-293 (2012)
| Abstract | The use of genetically modified plants in agriculture (GM crops) is controversially discussed in academic publications. Important issues are whether the release of GM crops is beneficial or harmful for the environment and therefore acceptable, and whether the modification of plants is ethically permissible per se . This study provides a comprehensive overview of the moral reasoning on the use of GM crops expressed in academic publications from 1975 to 2008. Environmental ethical aspects in the publications were investigated. Overall, 113 articles from 15 ecology, environmental ethics, and multidisciplinary science journals were systematically reviewed. Three types of moral concerns were used to structure the normative statements, moral notions, and moral issues found in the articles: concerns addressing consequences of the use of GM crops, concerns addressing the act (the technique itself), and concerns addressing the virtues of an actor. Articles addressing consequences (84%) dealt with general ecological and risk concerns or discussed specific ecological issues about the use of GM crops. Articles addressing the act (57%) dealt with the value of naturalness, the value of biotic entities, and conceptual reductionism, whereas articles addressing the actor (43%) dealt with virtues related to the handling of risks and the application of GM crops. The results of this study may help to structure the academic debate and contribute to a better understanding of moral concerns that are associated with the key aspects of the ethical theories of consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSean A. Weaver & Michael C. Morris (2005). Risks Associated with Genetic Modification: – An Annotated Bibliography of Peer Reviewed Natural Science Publications. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (2).
James Wilson (2007). GM Crops: Patently Wrong? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3).
Nicholas P. Guehlstorf (2008). Understanding the Scope of Farmer Perceptions of Risk: Considering Farmer Opinions on the Use of Genetically Modified (Gm) Crops as a Stakeholder Voice in Policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6).
Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan, Armin Spök & Rene C. Van Acker (forthcoming). Commercialization of Perennial Ge Crops: Looming Challenges for Regulatory Frameworks. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan, Armin Spök & Rene C. Van Acker (forthcoming). Commercialization of Perennial GE Crops: Looming Challenges for Regulatory Frameworks. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Matthew Lister (2007). Well-Ordered Science. Journal of Philosophical Research 32:127-139.
Paul Weirich (ed.) (2008). Labeling Genetically Modified Food: The Philosophical and Legal Debate. OUP USA.
Alison Bailey, Jan M. Boxill, Emmett L. Bradbury, Maudemarie Clark, Samir J. Haddad & Colin M. Patrick (2003). Book Notes. [REVIEW] Ethics 113 (4):923-928.
Michael J. Reiss (2001). Ethical Considerations at the Various Stages in the Development, Production, and Consumption of GM Crops. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):179-190.
Susan Carr & Les Levidow (2000). Exploring the Links Between Science, Risk, Uncertainty, and Ethics in Regulatory Controversies About Genetically Modified Crops. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (1):29-39.
John A. Howard & Kirby C. Donnelly (2004). A Quantitative Safety Assessment Model for Transgenic Protein Products Produced in Agricultural Crops. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (6).
Ulrich Heink, Robert Bartz & Ingo Kowarik (2012). How Useful Are the Concepts of Familiarity, Biological Integrity, and Ecosystem Health for Evaluating Damages by GM Crops? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (1):3-17.
Celina Ramjoué (2007). The Transatlantic Rift in Genetically Modified Food Policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-08-12Total downloads16 ( #74,618 of 549,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,706 of 549,007 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
