David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Behavior 13 (1):19 – 26 (2003)
Mental retardation (MR) is an invented bureaucratic category, currently undergoing radical rethinking and likely renaming, that includes many who have biologically based brain disorders, but is itself determined on functional criteria (e.g., IQ below a certain level) that are purely arbitrary. People with MR are socially vulnerable and thus are more likely to be "naíve confessors", "naíve defendants", and "naíve offenders." That is most likely the (largely unarticulated) rationale and justification for the Supreme Court's decision, in Atkins v. Virginia (2002), to exempt the class from execution. Although the decision is to be applauded as a step in a more humane direction, it is problematic to use an indirect, artificial, and insufficiently inclusive category to determine who should or should not be executed. Limited social intelligence (with consequent social vulnerability) is a characteristic of a wide range of brainbased syndromes and disorders, including many who fall above the (artificial) upper IQ limit and, thus, are ineligible for the MR label and the legal protections associated with it. A more equitable, and logical, policy would be to extend execution exemption to all who demonstrate the same kinds of vulnerabilities, especially if they can be linked to some brain-based medical condition, regardless of whether one qualifies for the (soon to be discarded) label of MR.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Arthur Caplan (2011). The Use of Prisoners as Sources of Organs–An Ethically Dubious Practice. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):1 - 5.
Kate Brown (2011). 'Vulnerability': Handle with Care. Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (3):313-321.
Enzo Rossi (2009). The Exemption That Confirms the Rule: Reflections on Proceduralism and the Uk Hybrid Embryos Controversy. Res Publica 15 (3):237-250.
Marilou Gagnon & Meryn Stuart (2009). Manufacturing Disability: HIV, Women and the Construction of Difference. Nursing Philosophy 10 (1):42-52.
Kenneth Decourcy Ferguson, Discourse and Discharge: Linguistic Analysis and Abuse of the 'Exemption by Declaration' Process in Bankruptcy.
Christopher Toner (2005). Just War and the Supreme Emergency Exemption. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (221):545 - 561.
Stephen R. Latham (2010). Speaking Off Label. Hastings Center Report 40 (6):9-10.
John H. Blume, Sheri Lynn Johnson & Christopher Seeds, Of Atkins and Men: Deviations From Clinical Definitions of Mental Retardation in Death Penalty Cases.
Florencia Luna (2009). Elucidating the Concept of Vulnerability: Layers Not Labels. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):121 - 139.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #549,393 of 1,793,159 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,411 of 1,793,159 )
How can I increase my downloads?