David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 11 (11):877-882 (1992)
Discussions of fairness in the workplace are built on assumptions about the organization of work and about fairness. Writers on business ethics have not appreciated that work is often organized differently in different stages of the life cycle of a firm. In this paper it is argued that the conceptions of fairness applied to a mature firm are often not applicable to a fledgling one. In a mature firm authority and responsibility are typically delegated and divided into specific jobs with relatively rigid boundaries. Thus, it has been argued that fairness in hiring requires specific job descriptions, fairness in remuneration requires standardized and graded salaries, and fairness in due process requires peer review. However, in the formative stages of a corporation, there may be very little differentiation or specialization. There is a continual re-definition of individual tasks through interaction with others as knowledge about products, production, and consumer demand are acquired by trial and error in the marketplace. Fairness takes a different form in this firm. The principle that similar people are to be treated similarly and different people differently can be operationalized in two ways. The mature firm typically focuses on differences; a fledgling, entrepreneurial one on similarities. How some of the issues of fairness in hiring, pay, and due process need to be reformulated once they are placed within the context of an entrepreneurial firm with its emphasis on similarity are then discussed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nel Noddings (1984). Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. University of California Press.
Max Weber, A. M. Henderson & Talcott Parsons (1948). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Philosophical Review 57 (5):524-528.
Patricia Werhane (1988). Persons, Rights, and Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (5):336-340.
Michael K. Green (1986). A Kantian Evaluation of Taylorism in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (2):165 - 169.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Roland E. Kidwell, Franz W. Kellermanns & Kimberly A. Eddleston (2012). Harmony, Justice, Confusion, and Conflict in Family Firms: Implications for Ethical Climate and the “Fredo Effect”. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 106 (4):503-517.
Brad Hooker (2005). Fairness. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):329 - 352.
Re'em Segev (2010). Hierarchical Consequentialism. Utilitas 22 (3):309-330.
S. Ramakrishna Velamuri (2002). Entrepreneurship, Altruism, and the Good Society. The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2002:125-142.
Christian Kiewitz (2005). Organizational Justice. Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (1):67-91.
Richard D. Arvey & Gary L. Renz (1992). Fairness in the Selection of Employees. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):331-340.
Donald Neubaum, Marie Mitchell & Marshall Schminke (2004). Firm Newness, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Ethical Climate. Journal of Business Ethics 52 (4):335 - 347.
Louis Kaplow (2002). Fairness Versus Welfare. Harvard University Press.
T. Phillips (2011). From the Ideal Market to the Ideal Clinic: Constructing a Normative Standard of Fairness for Human Subjects Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (1):79-106.
G. Stoney Alder & Joseph Gilbert (2006). Achieving Ethics and Fairness in Hiring: Going Beyond the Law. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 68 (4):449 - 464.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #332,048 of 1,796,251 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,795 of 1,796,251 )
How can I increase my downloads?