David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History of Political Thought 30 (2):272-85 (2009)
Madeleine de Scudery played a previously unrecognized part in the development of modern ideas of married friendship, and the eighteenth-century version of the distinction between the public and private spheres, through the influence of her novels on the political views of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Her development of the notions of tender friendship and tender love between the sexes helped change the way in which married love was conceptualized. She transformed the chivalric idea that women rule men through love, by making it compatible with marriage, and her ideas concerning the appropriate relationship between husband and wife were adapted by Rousseau, without acknowledgement, in his account of the relationship between Emile and Sophie
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Conley (forthcoming). Madeleine de Scudéry. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Karen Green (2013). Women's Writing and the Early Modern Genre Wars. Hypatia 28 (3):499-515.
Hsin-I. Liu (2006). The Impossibility of the Public. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:119-124.
Michele M. Moody-Adams (1996). Feminist Inquiry and the Transformation of the 'Public' Sphere in Virginia Held's "Feminist Morality". [REVIEW] Hypatia 11 (1):155 - 167.
Stephen Kalberg (1987). The Origin and Expansion of Kulturpessimismus: The Relationship Between Public and Private Spheres in Early Twentieth Century Germany. Sociological Theory 5 (2):150-164.
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.
Mark S. Cladis (2000). Redeeming Love: Rousseau and Eighteenth-Century Moral Philosophy. Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (2):221 - 251.
David B. Resnick (1999). Privatized Biomedical Research, Public Fears, and the Hazards of Government Regulation: Lessons From Stem Cell Research. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 7 (3):273-287.
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
Roger Ling (1993). Roman Private Art Elaine K. Gazda (Ed.) (Assisted by Anne E. Haekl): Roman Art in the Private Sphere. New Perspectives on the Architecture and Decor of the Domus, Villa, and Insula. Pp. Ix + 156; 32 Pages of Plates. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991. £29.95. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (01):138-139.
Krishan Kumar & Ekaterina Makarova (2008). The Portable Home: The Domestication of Public Space. Sociological Theory 26 (4):324 - 343.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-02-25
Total downloads1 ( #446,540 of 1,102,978 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,509 of 1,102,978 )
How can I increase my downloads?