Philosophy Compass 3 (4):721-733 (2008)
|Abstract||Hume begins the Treatise of Human Nature by announcing the goal of developing a science of man; by the end of Book 1 of the Treatise, the science of man seems to founder in doubt. Underlying the tension between Hume's constructive ambition – his 'naturalism'– and his doubts about that ambition – his 'skepticism'– is the question of whether Hume is justified in continuing his philosophical project. In this paper, I explain how this question emerges in the final section of Book 1 of the Treatise, the 'Conclusion of this Book', then examine Janet Broughton's and Don Garrett's answers to it, and conclude by sketching a different approach to this question.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Hume, David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2007). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 1: Texts. Clarendon Press.
David Hume (2007). A Treatise of Human Nature: A Critical Edition. Oxford University Press.
James A. Harris (2009). A Compleat Chain of Reasoning: Hume's Project Ina Treatise of Human Nature, Books One and Two. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt2):129-148.
James Baillie (2000). Hume on Morality. Routledge.
Paul Russell (2008). The Riddle of Hume's Treatise: Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion. Oxford University Press.
Colin Heydt (2010). The Riddle of Hume's Treatise :Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):401-402.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads94 ( #7,012 of 549,006 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #12,298 of 549,006 )
How can I increase my downloads?