David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Questions: Philosophy for Young People 10:1-3 (2010)
Gregory reports on a study by researchers from Ohio State and Pennsylvania State Universities that evaluated nine programs of classroom discussion. The programs were evaluated on their evidence of discourse features that have been shown in research literature to characterize quality discussions. Two programs, Philosophy for Children and Collaborative Reasoning, were found to provide the richest opportunities for individual and collective reasoning, due to the way teachers in these programs model and scaffold argumentation and cultivate a culture of dialogic inquiry in the classroom.
|Keywords||Philosophy for Children dialogue argumentation reasoning community of inquiry|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David B. Resnik (2005). Using Electronic Discussion Boards to Teach Responsible Conduct of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):617-630.
Michael Hand & Ralph Levinson (2011). Discussing Controversial Issues in the Classroom. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (6):614-629.
Maughn Rollins Gregory (2002). Constructivism, Standards, and the Classroom Community of Inquity. Educational Theory 52 (4):397-408.
Salvatore Vascellaro (2011). Out of the Classroom and Into the World: Unlocking the Educational Potential of America's Children and Teachers. New Press, The.
Judy A. Kyle, Investigating Philosophical Discussion with Children as Co-Researchers : A Case Story of Doing Educative Research Using Collaborative Philosophical Inquiry.
Mady Marantz (1988). Fostering Prosocial Behaviour in the Early Childhood Classroom: Review of the Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Education 17 (1):27-39.
Gilbert Burgh & Kim Nichols (2013). The Parallels Between Philosophical Inquiry and Scientific Inquiry: Implications for Science Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (10):1045-1059.
Ulrich Krohs (2006). Philosophies of Particular Biological Research Programs. Biological Theory 1 (2):182-187.
Kerryn Dixon (2013). A Change of Perspective: Seeing Through Children at the Front of the Classroom, to Seeing Children From the Back of the Classroom. Studies in Philosophy and Education 32 (3):273-284.
Mariale Hardiman, Luke Rinne, Emma Gregory & Julia Yarmolinskaya (2012). Neuroethics, Neuroeducation, and Classroom Teaching: Where the Brain Sciences Meet Pedagogy. [REVIEW] Neuroethics 5 (2):135-143.
Christie Cathey (2006). Thinking Outside the Room. Teaching Philosophy 29 (4):279-297.
Lynne E. Olson (2010). Developing a Framework for Assessing Responsible Conduct of Research Education Programs. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):185-200.
Maughn Gregory (2004). Practicing Democracy. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):163-176.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads9 ( #351,041 of 1,792,270 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,764 of 1,792,270 )
How can I increase my downloads?