Oughts and determinism: A response to Goldman
Philosophical Review 87 (1):77-83 (1978)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid Botting (2010). Three Theses on Acts. Philosophical Explorations 13 (1):65 – 79.
A. Goldman (1968). Actions, Predictions, and Books of Life. American Philosophical Quarterly 5 (July):135-151.
Stephen Finlay (2009). Oughts and Ends. Philosophical Studies 143 (3):315 - 340.
P. S. Greenspan (1975). Conditional Oughts and Hypothetical Imperatives. Journal of Philosophy 72 (10):259-276.
Brian Huss (2009). Three Challenges (and Three Replies) to the Ethics of Belief. Synthese 168 (2):249 - 271.
Niko Kolodny & John MacFarlane (2010). Ifs and Oughts. Journal of Philosophy 107 (3):115-143.
Hector-Neri Castaneda (1966). Imperatives, Oughts, and Moral Oughts. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 44 (3):277 – 300.
Anandi Hattiangadi (2007). Oughts and Thoughts: Rule-Following and the Normativity of Content. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #133,343 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
