David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
It is practically an article of faith in psychology that in order to do empirical research one must first operationally define one's variables. However, the 'operational attitude', first advocated by the physicist Percy Bridgman in the 1920s, has since been rejected by virtually every serious philosopher of science as unworkable. Furthermore. 'operationism' -- as developed by psychologists in the 1930s and 1940s -- was based on a misunderstanding of Bridgman's intent from the outset. Nevertheless, contemporary textbooks continue to extol the virtues of operational definitions and today's psychology students are still required to learn the strategy. This paper discusses the historical background of operationism, its transmission from physics to psychology and the reasons for its continued tenacity in the face of repeated refutations and Bridgman's own repudiation in the 1950s.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Nadelhoffer, Eddy A. Nahmias & Shaun Nichols (eds.) (2010). Moral Psychology: Historical and Contemporary Readings. Wiley-Blackwell.
Tadeusz W. Zawidzki (2003). Mythological Content: A Problem for Milikan's Teleosemantics. Philosophical Psychology 16 (4):535-538.
Hornell Hart (1940). Operationism Analysed Operationally. Philosophy of Science 7 (3):288-313.
Herbert Fingarette (1950). Unconscious Behavior and Allied Concepts: A New Approach to Their Empirical Interpretation. Journal of Philosophy 47 (August):509-519.
Uljana Feest (2005). Operationism in Psychology - What the Debate is About, What the Debate Should Be About. Journal for the Histoty of the Behavioral Sciences 41 (2):131-150.
S. Brian Hood & Benjamin J. Lovett (2011). Realism and Operationism in Psychiatric Diagnosis. Philosophical Psychology 24 (2):207-222.
R. S. Peters (1951). Observationalism in Psychology. Mind 60 (January):43-61.
C. A. Qadir (1961). Methodology of Psychology. Pakistan Philosophical Congress 8:133-144.
Gary L. Hardcastle (1995). S. S. Stevens and the Origins of Operationism. Philosophy of Science 62 (3):404-424.
Emilio Ribes-Iñesta (2003). What Is Defined in Operational Definitions? The Case of Operant Psychology. Behavior and Philosophy 31:111 - 126.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #482,295 of 1,789,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #263,819 of 1,789,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?