Graduate studies at Western
British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):15-32 (2010)
|Abstract||Certain simple thoughts about pictures suggest that the contents of pictures are closely bound to vision. But how far can the striking features of depiction be accounted for merely in terms of the especially visual contents which belong to pictures, without considering, for example, any issues concerning the nature of the visual experiences with which pictures provide us? This article addresses that question by providing an account of the distinctively visual contents belonging to pictures, and by using that account to explain many notable general facts about depiction. Some implications of the resulting framework for the main stream of current theorizing about pictorial representation are also discussed|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dominic Lopes (1995). Pictorial Realism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (3):277-285.
Catharine Abell (2007). Pictorial Realism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (1):1 – 17.
Robert Hopkins (2000). Touching Pictures. British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (1):149-167.
M. Pettersson (2011). Seeing What Is Not There: Pictorial Experience, Imagination and Non-Localization. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):279-294.
Robert Hopkins (1997). El Greco's Eyesight: Interpreting Pictures and the Psychology of Vision. Philosophical Quarterly 47 (189):441-458.
Dominic Mciver Lopes (2004). Directive Pictures. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (2):189–196.
Roberto Casati (2010). Hallucinatory Pictures. Acta Analytica 25 (3):365-368.
John Zeimbekis (2010). Pictures and Singular Thought. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (1):11-21.
Dominic Lopes (1996). Understanding Pictures. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-01-09
Total downloads99 ( #8,043 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,423 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?