David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review 9 (1-2):235-276 (1995)
More than three decades after its advent in political science, rational choice theory has yet to add appreciably to the stock of knowledge about politics. In Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory we traced this failure to methodological defects rooted in the aspiration to come up with universal theories of politics. After responding to criticisms of our argument, we elaborate on our earlier recommendations about how to improve the quality of rational choice applications. Building on suggestions of contributors to this volume, we lay out an empirically based research program designed to delineate the conditions under which rational choice explanations are likely to be useful.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael C. Munger (2011). Self-Interest and Public Interest: The Motivations of Political Actors. Critical Review 23 (3):339-357.
Similar books and articles
James Bernard Murphy (1995). Rational Choice Theory as Social Physics. Critical Review 9 (1-2):155-174.
Jeffrey Friedman (1995). Economic Approaches to Politics. Critical Review 9 (1-2):1-24.
Daniel Diermeier (1995). Rational Choice and the Role of Theory in Political Science. Critical Review 9 (1-2):59-70.
Michael Laver (1999). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications on Political Science, Donald P. Green and Ian Shapiro. Yale University Press, 1994, Xi + 239 Pages.The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered. Jeffrey Friedman (Ed). Yale University Press, 1996, Xi + 307 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 15 (01):136-.
Stanley Kelley (1995). The Promise and Limitations of Rational Choice Theory. Critical Review 9 (1-2):95-106.
Morris P. Fiorina (1995). Rational Choice, Empirical Contributions, and the Scientific Enterprise. Critical Review 9 (1-2):85-94.
Kaisa Herne & Maija Setälä (2004). A Response to the Critique of Rational Choice Theory: Lakatos' and Laudan's Conceptions Applied. Inquiry 47 (1):67 – 85.
Andrew Hindmoor (1998). Ian Shapiro and Donald P. Green, Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1994, Pp. Xi+ 239. [REVIEW] Utilitas 10 (3):370-.
Michael Taylor (1995). Battering RAMs. Critical Review 9 (1-2):223-234.
Kenneth A. Shepsle (1995). Statistical Political Philosphy and Positive Political Theory. Critical Review 9 (1-2):213-222.
Susanne Lohmann (1995). The Poverty of Green and Shapiro. Critical Review 9 (1-2):127-154.
Robert E. Lane (1995). What Rational Choice Explains. Critical Review 9 (1-2):107-126.
HÉlÈne Landemore (2004). Politics and the Economist-King: Is Rational Choice Theory the Science of Choice? Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (2):177-196.
Edward F. McClennen (1990). Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads19 ( #101,121 of 1,410,434 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #57,804 of 1,410,434 )
How can I increase my downloads?