Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (1):83 - 112 (1995)
|Abstract||Grice's Quantity maxims have been widely misinterpreted as enjoining a speaker to make the strongest claim that she can, while respecting the other conversational maxims. Although many writers on the topic of conversational implicature interpret the Quantity maxims as enjoining such volubility, so construed the Quantity maxims are unreasonable norms for conversation. Appreciating this calls for attending more closely to the notion of what a conversation requires. When we do so, we see that eschewing an injunction to maximal informativeness need not deprive us of any ability to predict or explain genuine cases of implicature. Crucial to this explanation is an appreciation of how what a conversation, or a given stage of a conversation, requires, depends upon what kind of conversation is taking place. I close with an outline of this dependence relation that distinguishes among three importantly distinct types of conversation.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Zali Gurevitch (1998). The Symposium: Culture as Daimonic Conversation. Human Studies 21 (4):437-454.
Eric Swanson (2010). Structurally Defined Alternatives and Lexicalizations of XOR. Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (1):31-36.
Nel Noddings (1994). Conversation as Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 23 (2):107-118.
Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari, Quantity and Quantity Value. Proc. TC1-TC7-TC13 14th IMEKO Joint Symposium.
Peter Kreeft (2009). If Einstein Had Been a Surfer: A Surfer, a Scientist, and a Philosopher Discuss a "Universal Wave Theory" or "Theory of Everything". St. Augustine's Press.
H. Paul Grice, [In: Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts, Ed. By Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #87,931 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,722 of 549,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?