Philosophical Review 121 (3):317-358 (2012)
|Abstract||Epistemologists and philosophers of mind both ask questions about belief. Epistemologists ask normative questions about belief—which beliefs ought we to have? Philosophers of mind ask metaphysical questions about belief—what are beliefs, and what does it take to have them? While these issues might seem independent of one another, there is potential for an interesting sort of conflict: the epistemologist might think we ought to have beliefs that, according to the philosopher of mind, it is impossible to have. This essay argues that this conflict does arise and that it creates problems for traditional skeptical views in epistemology. In particular, it argues that on certain popular views about the nature of belief, it is impossible to adopt the near-global agnosticism recommended by the skeptical epistemologist. On other plausible views, it is possible only in special circumstances, and this limitation undermines skeptical epistemological claims. The only views about the nature of belief on which there are no metaphysical hurdles to adopting the agnosticism recommended by the skeptic are views that face powerful objections—objections that are completely independent of antiskeptical epistemological considerations.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Kung (2011). On the Possibility of Skeptical Scenarios. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):387-407.
Stephen Hetherington, Fallibilism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Bryan Frances (2008). Live Skeptical Hypotheses. In John Greco (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford.
Eleonore Stump (1986). Penelhum on Skeptics and Fideists. Synthese 67 (1):147 - 154.
Wai-Hung Wong (2005). The Skeptical Paradox and the Indispensability of Knowledge-Beliefs. Synthese 143 (3):273-290.
Brian Ribeiro (2002). Epistemological Skepticism(s) and Rational Self-Control. The Monist 85 (3):468-477.
Zahoor-UL- Hassan, The Ideal of Free Will and Determination in Anglo American Philosophy During 1969-80, with Special Reference to Stuart Hampshire, Anthony Kenny, P.F Strawson, and Donald Davidson. [REVIEW]
Daniel Greco (forthcoming). A Puzzle About Epistemic Akrasia. Philosophical Studies.
Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.) (2011). Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press.
Jill Rusin (2012). Characterizing Skepticisms Import. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 2 (2):99-114.
Michael Lopresto (2011). The Ethics of Belief. Emergent Australasian Philosophers (4):9.
Added to index2012-07-26
Total downloads53 ( #19,296 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #6,708 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?