David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 9 (2):183 (1997)
This paper shows that the perceived difference between utilitarianism and natural rights theories in the eighteenth century was much less sharp than that in the twentieth century. This is demonstrated by exploring Josiah Tucker's critique of Locke and his disciples and the way in which the latter responded to it. Tucker's critique of Locke was based on a sharp distinction between a conception of natural rights as individual entitlements and the conception of the public good. The disciples of Locke did not share Tucker's views and his interpretation of Locke. In defending natural rights they appealed less to the notion of moral agency and more to utilitarian ideas. The extent to which the advocates of the rights of man employed utilitarian ideas is obscured by the fact that they never divested themselves of the political advantage of using the words even when their arguments were closer to the principle of utility
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2005). Natural Rights Liberalism From Locke to Nozick. Cambridge University Press.
Mark Rowlands (2009). Animal Rights: Moral Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Henrik Syse (2007). Natural Law, Religion, and Rights: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Natural Law and Natural Rights, with Special Emphasis on the Teachings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. St. Augustine's Press.
Jacqueline A. Laing, Rights. A Companion to Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand.
Gregory I. Molivas (1997). Richard Price, the Debate on Free Will, and Natural Rights. Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (1):105-123.
Gary B. Herbert (2005). On the Misconceived Genealogy of Human Rights. Social Philosophy Today 21:17-32.
Hans Werner Ingensiep (1996). Tierseele und tierethische Argumentationen in der deutschen philosophischen Literatur des 18. Jahrhunderts. NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 4 (1):103-118.
Jacqueline A. Laing (1997). Introduction to Human Lives. In David S. Oderberg & Jacqueline A. Laing (eds.), Human Lives: Critical Essays on Consequentialist Bioethics. Macmillan
Hugh V. McLachlan (2010). Moral Rights to Life, Both Natural and Non-Natural: Reflections on James Griffin's Account of Human Rights. Diametros 26:58-76.
James W. Ceaser (2012). Progressivism and the Doctrine of Natural Rights. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2):177-195.
J. T. Eberl, E. D. Kinney & M. J. Williams (2011). Foundation For A Natural Right To Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (6):537-557.
Clark Butler (2002). Human Rights. Philo 5 (1):5-22.
C. Fred Alford (2010). Narrative, Nature, and the Natural Law: From Aquinas to International Human Rights. Palgrave Macmillan.
David McCarthy (2008). Utilitarianism and Prioritarianism II. Economics and Philosophy 24 (1):1-33.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads22 ( #163,497 of 1,790,069 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #63,644 of 1,790,069 )
How can I increase my downloads?