Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Issues 17 (1):57–69 (2007)
|Abstract||The claim that knowledge is a kind of success from ability has great theoretical power: it explains the nature of epistemic normativity, why knowledge is incompatible with luck, and why knowledge is more valuable than mere true belief. This paper addresses objections to the view by wedding it with two additional ideas: that intellectual abilities display a certain structure, and that the concept of knowledge functions to flag good information, and good sources of information, for use in practical reasoning.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alan Millar (2009). What is It That Cognitive Abilities Are Abilities to Do? Acta Analytica 24 (4):223-236.
Patrick Hawley (2007). Skepticism and the Value of Knowledge. In Chienkuo Mi Ruey-lin Chen (ed.), Naturalized Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.
Franck Lihoreau (2008). Knowledge-How and Ability. Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):263-305.
Berit Brogaard (forthcoming). Knowledge-How: A Unified Account. In J. Bengson & M. Moffett (eds.), Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action. Oxford University Press.
Sam Coleman (2009). Why the Ability Hypothesis is Best Forgotten. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (2-3):74-97.
Daniel Whiting (2012). Epistemic Value and Achievement. Ratio 25 (2):216-230.
John Greco (2010). Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity. Cambridge University Press.
John Greco (2009). Knowledge and Success From Ability. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):17 - 26.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads82 ( #11,458 of 722,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,863 of 722,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?