David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1093-1111 (2010)
This article calls for a critical re-evaluation of Walzer’s theory of justice. It argues that there is a deep tension between Walzer’s social criticism and his complex equality. Social criticism is based on the normative value of a connected and ‘whole’ self, and complex equality is based upon a value pluralism that threatens to fragment this sense of wholeness. Walzer therefore commissions a tacit premise, borrowing from the same ‘political philosophy’ that he explicitly repudiates, and which social criticism is intended to supplant. This premise is a Kantian-inspired conception of self; brought to the argument as an a priori premise and thus in violation of Walzer’s own stated commitment to ‘internalism’ and ‘interpretation’. Furthermore, this same conception of self is the moral source of Walzer’s substantive commitment to the universal value of pluralist political regimes. The article closes with a suggested reconciliation of the inherent tension within Walzer’s theory
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
M. Agnafors (2012). Reassessing Walzer's Social Criticism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (9):917-937.
Jonathan Allen (1998). The Situated Critic or the Loyal Critic? Rorty and Walzer on Social Criticism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (6):25-46.
Tyler T. Roberts (1994). Michael Walzer and the Critical Connection. Journal of Religious Ethics 22 (2):333 - 353.
Stephen E. Lammers (1983). Area Bombing in World War II: The Argument of Michael Walzer. Journal of Religious Ethics 11 (1):96 - 113.
Graham Parsons (2012). The Incoherence of Walzer's Just War Theory. Social Theory and Practice 38 (4):663-88.
Alan Revering (2005). Eschatology in the Political Theory of Michael Walzer. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (1):91 - 117.
Charles Larmore (1990). Book Review:The Company of Critics: Social Criticism and Political Commitment in the Twentieth Century. Michael Walzer. [REVIEW] Ethics 100 (2):436-.
Endre Begby (2003). Liberty, Statehood and Sovereignty: Walzer on Mill on Non-Intervention. Journal of Military Ethics 2 (1):46-62.
Eric O. Jacobsen (2008). Mr Walzer's Neighborhood: The Need for Geographic Particularity in Distributive Ethics. Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (1):1 – 16.
Michael Walzer (1987). Interpretation and Social Criticism. Harvard University Press.
Joseph Raz (1991). Morality as Interpretation:Interpretation and Social Criticism. Michael Walzer. Ethics 101 (2):392-.
Michael F. Shaughnessy & Mitja Sardoc (2002). An Interview with Michael Walzer. Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (1):65-75.
Eugene Schlossberger (2001). :Social Justice From Hume to Walzer. [REVIEW] Ethics 111 (4):804-806.
Added to index2010-10-26
Total downloads20 ( #91,965 of 1,139,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #157,515 of 1,139,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?