Will the real Enlightenment historian please stand up? Catharine Macaulay versus David Hume

In Stephen Buckle Craig Taylor (ed.), Hume and the Enlightenment. Pickering & Chatto (2011)
Abstract
Argues that on an interpretation of the Enlightenment which emphasises its radical potential and importance for the development of democracy Catharine Macaulay should be recognised as a more centrally Enlightenment historian than David Hume.
Keywords democratic theory  David Hume  Catharine Macaulay
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,456
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Karen Green (2012). Catharine Macaulay. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
David Wootton (2009). David Hume: "The Historian". In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Anne Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2012-03-20

Total downloads

0

Recent downloads (6 months)

0

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.