Comparing apples to oranges: Who does the framing?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):656-656 (2005)
| Abstract | The idea of “bundling” lesser later rewards so they outweigh smaller sooner rewards is compelling, but the sophisticated cognitive activity involved in this bundling is not yet modeled; in particular the role of language is hard to assess. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert Northcott (2005). Comparing Apples with Oranges. Analysis 65 (285):12–18.
Daniel C. Dennett (1998). Preston on Exaptation: Herons, Apples, and Eggs. Journal of Philosophy 95 (11):576-580.
Robert Pahre (1996). Mathematical Discourse and Cross-Disciplinary Communities: The Case of Political Economy. Social Epistemology 10 (1):55 – 73.
Carol S. Jeffers (2010). A Still Life is Really a Moving Life: The Role of Mirror Neurons and Empathy in Animating Aesthetic Response. Journal of Aesthetic Education 44 (2):pp. 31-39.
Alex Mintz & Steven B. Redd (2003). Framing Effects in International Relations. Synthese 135 (2):193 - 213.
William C. Dell (2010). Deconstructing Zen: Apples and Oranges, Strings and Branes, and the Buddha's Belly. Millennial Mind Pub..
Gail Gaisin Glicksman & Allen Glicksman (2006). Apples and Oranges : A Critique of Current Trends in the Study of Religion, Spirituality, and Health. In David E. Guinn (ed.), Handbook of Bioethics and Religion. Oxford University Press.
P. Kyle Stanford (forthcoming). Underdetermination. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,407 of 548,941 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
