Graduate studies at Western
Social Evolution and History 10 (1):234–275 (2011)
|Abstract||It is often noted in the academic literature that chiefdoms frequently prove to be troublesome for scholars because of the disagreement as to whether to categorize this or that polity as a complex chiefdom or as an early state. This is no wonder, because complex chiefdoms, early states, as well as different other types of sociopolitical systems (large confederations, large self-governed civil and temple communities etc.) turn out to be at the same evolutionary level. In the present article it is argued that such complex societies can be considered as early state analogues. The most part of the article is devoted to the analysis of the most developed chiefdoms – the Hawaiian ones. It is argued that before the arrival of Cook there was no state in Hawaii. It should be classified as an early state analogue, i.e. a society of the same level of development as early states but lacking some state characteristics. It proceeds from the fact that the entire Hawaiian political and social organization was based on the strict rules and ideology of kinship, and the ruling groups represented endogamous castes and quasi-castes. The transition to statehood occurred only in the reign of Kamehameha I in the early 19th century. A scrupulous comparison between the Hawaiian chiefdoms and Hawaiian state is presented in the article.|
|Keywords||chiefdom state evolurion Hawaii political|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Leonid Grinin (2009). The Pathways of Politogenesis and Models of the Early State Formation. Social Evolution and History 8 (1):92-132.
Leonid Grinin (2008). Early State, Developed State, Mature State: The Statehood Evolutionary Sequence. Social Evolution and History 7 (1).
Leonid Grinin (2004). Early State and Democracy. In Leonid Grinin, Robert Carneiro, Dmitri Bondarenko, Nikolay Kradin & Andrey Korotayev (eds.), The Early State, Its Alternatives and Analogues. ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House.
Leonid Grinin, Robert Carneiro, Dmitri Bondarenko, Nikolay Kradin & Andrey Korotayev (eds.) (2004). The Early State, Its Alternatives and Analogues. ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House.
Charles A. Hart (1940). Philosophy of the State: The Individual; Civil Rights; the Democratic State; the Totalitarian State; the Corporative State; Church and State. [Washington, D.C.,G. Dawe].
Nafeez Mossadeq Ahmed (2013). Capitalism, Covert Action and State-Terrorism: Toward a Political Economy of the Dual State. In Eric Michael Wilson (ed.), The Dual State: Parapolitics, Carl Schmitt and the National Security Complex. Ashgate.
Andre Santos Campos (2010). The Individuality of the State in Spinoza's Political Philosophy. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 92 (1):1-38.
Andres Rosler (2011). Odi Et Amo? Hobbes on the State of Nature. Hobbes Studies 24 (1):91-111.
Charles Sayward & Wayne Wasserman (1981). Has Nozick Justified the State? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62:411-415.
Eric Michael Wilson (2013). The Dual State: Parapolitics, Carl Schmitt and the National Security Complex. Ashgate.
Raju J. Das (1996). State Theories: A Critical Analysis. Science and Society 60 (1):27 - 57.
Alexandra Dobra (2009). Plato's Political Philosophy: The Ideal State in The Republic. Studia UBB Philosophia 2 (2009):83-91.
Mel Rothenberg (1995). Lenin on the State. Science and Society 59 (3):418 - 436.
Michael Jacovides (2010). Experiences as Complex Events. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):141-159.
Added to index2011-09-26
Total downloads4 ( #189,403 of 739,080 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,080 )
How can I increase my downloads?