David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This Article examines the influence of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) on affective attitudes toward children with disabilities and on the incidence of disability-selective abortion. Applying regression analysis to U.S. natality data, we find that the birthrate of children with Down syndrome declined significantly in the years following the ADA's passage. Controlling for technological, demographic, and cultural variables suggests that the ADA may have encouraged prospective parents to prevent the existence of the very class of people the Act was designed to protect. We explain this paradox by showing how specific ADA provisions could have given rise to demeaning media depictions and social conditions that reinforced negative understandings and expectations among prospective parents about what it means to have a child with a disability. We discuss implications for reproduction law and antidiscrimination policy.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeremy Williams (2012). Sex-Selective Abortion: A Matter of Choice. Law and Philosophy 31 (2):125-159.
Pamela Robert (2003). Disability Oppression in the Contemporary U. S. Capitalist Workplace. Science and Society 67 (2):136 - 159.
Anita Silvers (1996). (In) Equality, (Ab) Normality, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):209-224.
Dan W. Brock, Health Care Resource Prioritization and Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities.
Alicia R. Ouellette, Insult to Injury: A Disability-Sensitive Response to Professor Smolensky's Call for Parental Tort Liability for Preimplantation Genetic Interventions.
Nicklas A. Akers (2000). Disability & ADA: Disparate Insurance Coverage for Physical and Psychological Disabilities Does Not Violate ADA. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 28 (1):92-94.
Added to index2009-03-22
Total downloads44 ( #76,058 of 1,725,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,716 of 1,725,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?