Debating Forgiveness: A Reply to My Critics [Book Review]
Philosophia 38 (3):457-473 (2010)
|Abstract||In this essay I offer a detailed reply to three critics (whose commentaries are included in this issue of Philosophia) of my Forgiveness: a Philosophical Exploration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007). The topics explored include the nature and limits of forgiveness; its unconditional or conditional character; the problem of distinguishing between central and marginal cases; the analysis of political apology; and questions of philosophical methodology|
|Keywords||Forgiveness Unconditional forgiveness Conditional forgiveness Paradigm cases Excuse Condonation Clemency Mercy Reconciliation Anger Moral ideals Virtue theory Secular and religious approaches Analytical strategy|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hailey Huget (2012). Forgiveness, Reconciliation, and Accountability: A Critique of Charles Griswold's Forgiveness Paradigm. Philosophia 40 (2):337-355.
Howard Wettstein (2010). Forgiveness and Moral Reckoning. Philosophia 38 (3):445-455.
Zenon Szablowinski (2011). Self-Forgiveness and Forgiveness. Heythrop Journal 53 (4):678-689.
Espen Gamlund (2010). Supererogatory Forgiveness. Inquiry 53 (6):540-564.
Zenon Szablowinski (2011). Apology with and Without a Request for Forgiveness. Heythrop Journal 53 (5):731-741.
Charles L. Griswold (2007). Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. Cambridge University Press.
Michele Moody-Adams (2010). Reply to Griswold, Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. [REVIEW] Philosophia 38 (3):429-437.
Added to index2010-06-30
Total downloads28 ( #49,781 of 722,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?