David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 7 (1/2/3):847-858 (1992)
In this paper I offer an interpretation of those paragraphs of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus in which Wittgenstein talks about negative facts. In my opinion we cannot conclude that Wittgenstein held that negative facts have actual existence, as RusselI, for example, did.By means of a kind of journey through several possible interpretations, I arrive to the conclusion that negative facts are nothing but non-effective possibilities; they are in the logical space, in the field of possible worlds, but they have no actual existence, they are not inhabitants of the world. Finally, it is suggested that, insofar as pictures are facts, the only negative facts were, for Wittgenstein, the negative pictures and not what those pictures depict
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hong LI & Donghui HAN (2007). What is "the Ineffable" Exactly? An Extensive Reading of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):402 - 411.
Mark Jago & Stephen Barker (2012). Being Positive About Negative Facts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):117-138.
Colin Cheyne & Charles Pigden (2006). Negative Truths From Positive Facts. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):249 – 265.
L. Nathan Oaklander & Silvano Miracchi (1980). Russell, Negative Facts, and Ontology. Philosophy of Science 47 (3):434-455.
Wayne A. Patterson (1996). The Logical Structure of Russell's Negative Facts. Russell 16 (1):45 - 66.
Giorgio Lando (2007). Tractarian Ontology: Mereology or Set Theory? Forum Philosophicum 12 (2):24-39.
E. D. Klemke (1971). Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana,University of Illinois Press.
Peter M. Sullivan (2005). Identity Theories of Truth and the Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations 28 (1):43–62.
Anthony Palmer (2011). Propositions, Properties and Relations: Wittgenstein's “Notes on Logic” and the Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations 34 (1):77-93.
Peter M. Sullivan (2000). The Totality of Facts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (2):175–192.
Hong Li & Donghui Han (2007). What is “the Ineffable” Exactly? Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):402-411.
R. A. Young (2004). Wittgenstein's Tractatus Project as Philosophy of Information. Minds and Machines 14 (1):119-132.
Gunnar Björnsson, If You Believe in Positive Facts, You Should Believe in Negative Facts. Hommage à Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz.
Daqiang Li (2008). 对象、可能世界与必然性 —《逻辑哲学论》的本体论分析. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:319-333.
Christopher Campbell (2014). Categorial Indeterminacy, Generality and Logical Form in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):138-158.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads4 ( #258,599 of 1,102,835 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,987 of 1,102,835 )
How can I increase my downloads?