David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The proposed settlement in the Google Book Search case should be approved with strings attached. The project will be immensely good for society, and the proposed deal is a fair one for Google, for authors, and for publishers. The public interest demands, however, that the settlement be modiﬁed ﬁrst. It creates two new entities - the Books Rights Registry Leviathan and the Google Book Search Behemoth - with dangerously concentrated power over the publishing industry. Left unchecked, they could trample on consumers in any number of ways. We the public have a right to demand that those entities be subject to healthy, pro-competitive oversight, and so we should.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Susan J. Hekman (2010). The Material of Knowledge: Feminist Disclosures. Indiana University Press.
Jill McTavish, Roma Harris & Nadine Wathen (2011). Searching for Health: The Topography of the First Page. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):227-240.
Tom Burke (2010). Empiricism, Pragmatism, and the Settlement Movement. The Pluralist 5 (3):73-88.
George G. Brenkert (2009). Google, Human Rights, and Moral Compromise. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):453 - 478.
Anthony F. Beavers (2005). Searching for Philosophy. Teaching Philosophy 28 (4):367-371.
Richard Gordon (2009). Google Embryo for Building Quantitative Understanding of an Embryo As It Builds Itself. I. Lessons From Ganymede and Google Earth. Biological Theory 4 (4):390-395.
David A. Edwards (2008). Artscience: Creativity in the Post-Google Generation. Harvard University Press.
Mary Jiang Bresnahan & Kevin Mahler (2010). Ethical Debate Over Organ Donation in the Context of Brain Death. Bioethics 24 (2):54-60.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-04-23
Total downloads1 ( #398,768 of 1,096,439 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #231,754 of 1,096,439 )
How can I increase my downloads?