Production Revolutions and Periodization of History: A Comparative and Theoretic-mathematical Approach
Graduate studies at Western
Social Evolution and History 6 (2) (2007)
|Abstract||There is no doubt that periodization is a rather effective method of data ordering and analysis, but it deals with exceptionally complex types of processual and temporal phenomena and thus it simplifies historical reality. Many scholars emphasize the great importance of periodization for the study of history. In fact, any periodization suffers from one-sidedness and certain deviations from reality. However, the number and significance of such deviations can be radically diminished as the effectiveness of periodization is directly connected with its author's understanding of the rules and peculiarities of this methodological procedure. In this paper we would like to suggest a model of periodization of history based on our theory of historical process. We shall also demonstrate some possibilities of mathematical modeling for the problems concerning the macroperiodization of the world historical process. This analysis identifies a number of cycles within this process and suggests its generally hyperexponential shape, which makes it possible to propose a number of forecasts concerning the forthcoming decades.|
|Keywords||history periodization production Industrial Revolution hunter-gatherer information revolution|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edmund D. Abegg (1972). The Trait-Dominance Theory of Historical Periodization. Journal of Critical Analysis 3 (4):188-198.
Kathleen Davis (2010). The Sense of an Epoch : Periodization, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Secularization. In Andrew Cole & D. Vance Smith (eds.), The Legitimacy of the Middle Ages: On the Unwritten History of Theory. Duke University Press.
Donald Gunn Macrae (1973). Ages and Stages: Auguste Comte Memorial Trust Lectures, Delivered on 18 November 1971 at the London School of Economics and Political Science. [REVIEW] London,Athlone Press.
Margaret C. Jacob (1997). Scientific Culture and the Making of the Industrial West. Oxford University Press.
Charles Orser (2013). The Politics of Periodization. In Alfredo González Ruibal (ed.), Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity. Routledge.
Igorʹ Mikhaĭlovich Dʹi͡akonov (1999). The Paths of History. Cambridge University Press.
Nicholas Tilley (1984). Periodization, Holism and Historicism: A Reply to Jacobs. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14 (3):393-395.
Donald Gillies (ed.) (1992). Revolutions in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
J. Obi Oguejiofor (2003). Problems and Prospects of a History of African Philosophy. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):477-498.
B. Pourciau (2000). Intuitionism as a (Failed) Kuhnian Revolution in Mathematics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):297-329.
Leonid Grinin (2012). Macrohistory and Globalization. Uchitel Publishing House.
Colin Koopman (2010). Historicism in Pragmatism: Lessons in Historiography and Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 41 (5):690-713.
Steven E. Wallis (ed.) (2010). The Structure of Theory and the Structure of Scientific Revolutions: What Constitutes an Advance in Theory? IGI Global.
Uwe Riss (2011). Objects and Processes in Mathematical Practice. Foundations of Science 16 (4):337-351.
David N. Livingstone & Charles W. J. Withers (eds.) (2005). Geography and Revolution. University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2011-09-26
Total downloads7 ( #142,372 of 739,319 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,319 )
How can I increase my downloads?