Response to “Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Don't Use the Wrong Cases” by Howard Brody and “Commentary: Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Are the Cases Wrong?” by L.J. Schneiderman (CQ Vol 7, No 3) [Book Review]
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (04):527-537 (1999)
|Abstract||In a recent issue of CambridgeQuarterlyofHealthcareEthics, Howard Brody and Lawrence Schneiderman offer contrasting opinions about how to apply the concept of in medicine. Brody holds that are those in which it is reasonably certain that a given intervention when applied for the purpose of attaining a specific clinical goal. To determine which actions are futile, Brody prescribes a division of labor. Patients (or patient surrogates) are charged with choosing the goals of treatment while physicians are charged with determining whether specific treatments will be effective in achieving these goals. Though physicians do not choose specific goals, Brody thinks they have a prerogative to decide whether they can, in good conscience, aid in the achievement of specific patient goals. Let us use to denote choosing between alternative goals and to denote choices about whether one will assist in the pursuit of particular goals. Brody's position is essentially that patients are positive validators and that physicians are negative validators. Brody concludes that treatments that are effective in achieving patients' goals are not futileFutilitypromote a goal that both agree is desirable.”|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Howard Brody (1998). Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Don't Use the Wrong Cases. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (03).
Lawrence J. Schneiderman (1998). Commentary: Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Are the Cases Wrong? Lawrence J. Schneiderman. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):273-278.
Thomas Tomlinson (2007). Futility Beyond CPR: The Case of Dialysis. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 19 (1):33-43.
Lawrence J. Schneiderman, Holly Teetzel & Todd Gilmer (2003). Response to “Reading Futility: Reflections on a Bioethical Concept” by Donald Joralemon (CQ Vol 11, No 2), The Rise and Fall of Death: The Plateau of Futility. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (03):308-309.
John C. Moskop (1995). From Futility to Triage. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):191-205.
L. J. Schneiderman (2008). Embracing Our Mortality: Hard Choices in an Age of Medical Miracles. Oxford University Press.
Wayne Shelton (1998). A Broader Look at Medical Futility. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (4):383-400.
Rosemarie Tong (1995). Towards a Just, Courageous, and Honest Resolution of the Futility Debate. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):165-189.
Donald Joralemon (2004). Response to “The Rise and Fall of Death: The Plateau of Futility” by Lawrence J. Schneiderman, Holly Teetzel, and Todd Gilmer (CQ Vol 12, No 3): Correcting False Impressions. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (03):288-288.
Lawrence Schneiderman (2011). Defining Medical Futility and Improving Medical Care. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):123-131.
William Harper (1998). Judging Who Should Live: Schneiderman and Jecker on the Duty Not to Treat. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (5):500 – 515.
Daniel P. Sulmasy (1997). Futility and the Varieties of Medical Judgment. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2).
Charles Weijer, Peter A. Singer, Bernard M. Dickens & Stephen Workman, Bioethics for Clinicians: 16. Dealing with Demands for Inappropriate Treatment.
Vinit Haksar (2011). Necessary Evil: Justification, Excuse or Pardon? [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):333-347.
M. Wreen (2007). Medical Futility and Physician Discretion. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1 (3):257-267.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads8 ( #131,640 of 722,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?