Philosophy of Science 57 (3):514-522 (1990)
|Abstract||After presenting the major objections raised against standard formulations of the H-D method of theory testing, I identify what seems to be an important element of truth underlying the method. I then draw upon this element in an effort to develop a plausible formulation of the H-D method which avoids the various objections|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tamas Demeter (2009). Can the Strong Program Be Generalized? Review of Sociology 15 (1):5-16.
Erik Curiel (2001). Against the Excesses of Quantum Gravity: A Plea for Modesty. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S424-.
J. Worrall (2000). The Scope, Limits, and Distinctiveness of the Method of 'Deduction From the Phenomena': Some Lessons From Newton's 'Demonstrations' in Optics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (1):45-80.
Valerie Gray Hardcastle (1999). Scientific Papers Have Various Structures. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):415-439.
Howard Sankey (2002). Realism, Method and Truth. In Michele Marsonet (ed.), The Problem of Realism. Ashgate.
Sam S. Rakover (2002). Reconstruction of Past Events From Memory: An Alternative to the Hypothetico-Deductive (H-D) Method. Behavior and Philosophy 30:101 - 122.
Chrysostomos Mantzavinos (2005). Naturalistic Hermeneutics. Cambridge University Press.
Brian D. Haig (2000). Statistical Significance Testing, Hypothetico-Deductive Method, and Theory Evaluation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):292-293.
Theo A. F. Kuipers (2009). Empirical Progress and Truth Approximation by the 'Hypothetico-Probabilistic Method'. Erkenntnis 70 (3):313 - 330.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #44,779 of 722,701 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,701 )
How can I increase my downloads?