The need for explanation in the philosophy of mind: A case study
|Abstract||Explanatory inquiry characteristically begins with a certain puzzlement about the world. But why do certain situations elicit our puzzlement (or curiosity) while others leave us, in some epistemically relevant sense, cold? Moreover, what exactly is involved in the move from a state of puzzlement to a state where one’s puzzlement is satisfied? In this paper I try to make sense of these questions by focusing on two case studies, one from the popular literature on string theory and one from recent debates in the philosophy of mind|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lawrence Brian Lombard (1986). Events: A Metaphysical Study. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Neil C. Manson (2004). Reason Explanation a First-Order Rationalizing Account. Philosophical Explorations 7 (2):113 – 129.
Steven D. Hales (2001). Reincarnation Redux. Philosophia 28 (1-4):359-367.
Daniel Steel (1998). Warfare and Western Manufactures: A Case Study of Explanation in Anthropology. Philosophy of Science 65 (4):649-671.
D. Turner (2000). The Functions of Fossils: Inference and Explanation in Functional Morphology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 31 (1):193-212.
Mario Brandhorst (forthcoming). Naturalism and the Genealogy of Moral Institutions. Journal of Nietzsche Studies.
Joshua Knobe (2007). Reason Explanation in Folk Psychology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31 (1):90–106.
Stephen R. Grimm (2008). Explanatory Inquiry and the Need for Explanation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):481-497.
Stephen R. Grimm (2006). The Need for Explanation in the Philosophy of Mind. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:237-244.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?