The presidential address discrepancies between the bestphilosophical account of human rights and the international law of human rights
Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):1–28 (2001)
|Abstract||The best philosophical account of human rights regards them as protections of the values we attach to human agency. The international law of human rights is embodied in a large number of declarations, conventions, covenants, charters, and judicial decisions. There are many discrepancies between the lists of human rights that emerge from these two authoritative sources. This lecture explores the significance of these discrepancies|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joseph Raz (2010). Human Rights Without Foundations. In J. Tasioulas & S. Besson (eds.), The Philosphy of International Law. Oxford University Press.
John Mahoney (2007). The Challenge of Human Rights: Origin, Development, and Significance. Blackwell Pub..
S. Matthew Liao (2010). Agency and Human Rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):15-25.
Frederic Megret, The Disabilities Convention: Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities or Disability Rights?
Christian Barry & Nicholas Southwood (2011). What Is Special About Human Rights? Ethics and International Affairs 25 (3):369-83.
Mayra Gómez (2003). Human Rights in Cuba, El Salvador, and Nicaragua: A Sociological Perspective on Human Rights Abuse. Routledge.
James Griffin (2001). Discrepancies Between the Best Philosophical Account of Human Rights and the International Law of Human Rights. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):1-28.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #35,949 of 738,370 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,370 )
How can I increase my downloads?