David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Evolution and History 8 (1):92-132 (2009)
This article considers concrete manifestations of the politogenesis multilinearity and the variation of its forms; it analyzes the main causes that determined the politogenetic pathway of a given society. The respective factors include the polity's size, its ecological and social environment. The politogenesis should be never reduced to the only one evolutionary pathway leading to the statehood. The early state formation was only one of many versions of development of complex late archaic social systems. The author designates various complex non-state political systems as early state analogues. The early state analogue posed a real alternative to the state for a rather long period of time, whereas in many ecologically marginal regions they could compete quite seriously with the state sometimes until recently. Thus, it was only in the final count that the state became the leading form of political organization of complex societies. The very pathways to statehood had a few versions. One may group them into two main types: ‘vertical’ and ‘horizontal’. Within the ‘vertical’ model the state formation took place in a direct way, i.e. directly from small pre-state polities to primitive statehood. Within the ‘horizontal’ model we first ob-serve the formation of early state analogues that were quite com-parable to the state as regards their complexity, whereas later those analogues were transformed into states
|Keywords||state state formation process complexity poleis Hawaii stateless archaic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Leonid Grinin (2011). Complex Chiefdom: Precursor of the State or Its Analogue? Social Evolution and History 10 (1):234–275.
Leonid Grinin (2008). Early State, Developed State, Mature State: The Statehood Evolutionary Sequence. Social Evolution and History 7 (1).
Leonid Grinin (2004). Early State and Democracy. In Leonid Grinin, Robert Carneiro, Dmitri Bondarenko, Nikolay Kradin & Andrey Korotayev (eds.), The Early State, Its Alternatives and Analogues. ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House. 419--463.
Leonid Grinin, Robert Carneiro, Dmitri Bondarenko, Nikolay Kradin & Andrey Korotayev (eds.) (2004). The Early State, Its Alternatives and Analogues. ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House.
Charles A. Hart (1940). Philosophy of the State: The Individual; Civil Rights; the Democratic State; the Totalitarian State; the Corporative State; Church and State. [Washington, D.C.,G. Dawe].
Ja Ian Chong (2012). External Intervention and the Politics of State Formation: China, Indonesia, and Thailand, 1893-1952. Cambridge University Press.
Charles Sayward & Wayne Wasserman (1981). Has Nozick Justified the State? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (4):411-415.
Matthew J. Webb (2006). Is There a Liberal Right to Secede From a Liberal State? TRAMES 10 (4):371-386.
Mel Rothenberg (1995). Lenin on the State. Science and Society 59 (3):418 - 436.
Murray Rothbard (1977). Robert Nozick and the Immaculate Conception of the State. Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):45-57.
Jieli Li (2002). State Fragmentation: Toward a Theoretical Understanding of the Territorial Power of the State. Sociological Theory 20 (2):139-156.
Raju J. Das (1996). State Theories: A Critical Analysis. Science and Society 60 (1):27 - 57.
Added to index2011-12-29
Total downloads56 ( #40,286 of 1,696,470 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #113,165 of 1,696,470 )
How can I increase my downloads?