Graduate studies at Western
International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (1):107-126 (2006)
|Abstract||This paper examines the tensions at play in three important documents involved in the ‘war on terror’: the “Application of Treaties” White House Legal Counsel Memo of 2001, the “National Security Strategy” document of 2002, and the 2004 Supreme Court decision Hamdi v. Rumsfeld. Reading these documents, it becomes clear that there is an overarching misunderstanding and confusion of the traditionally separate concepts of ‘criminal’ and ‘enemy’ in the struggle against globalized terrorism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Claudia Card (2003). Questions Regarding a War on Terrorism. Hypatia 18 (1):164 - 169.
John M. Burkoff (2005). Review Essay/Defeating Terrorism Without Fighting a War. Criminal Justice Ethics 24 (1):47-51.
Anne Schwenkenbecher (2012). Terrorism: A Philosophical Enquiry. Palgrave Macmillan.
Igor Primoratz (ed.) (2004). Terrorism: The Philosophical Issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
Samir Kumar Das & Rada Iveković (eds.) (2010). Terror, Terrorism, States, and Societies: A Historical and Philosophical Perspective. Women Unlimited.
Seumas Miller (2004). Terrorism and Collective Responsibility. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):263-281.
Ben Saul, The Curious Element of Motive in Definitions of Terrorism: Essential Ingredient - or Criminalising Thought?
Cindy D. Kam & Donald R. Kinder, Terror and Ethnocentrism: Foundations of American Support for the War on Terrorism.
Paul Gilbert (1994). Terrorism, Security, and Nationality: An Introductory Study in Applied Political Philosophy. Routledge.
Shawn Kaplan (2009). Three Prejudices Against Terrorism. Critical Studies on Terrorism 2 (2):181-199.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads3 ( #213,863 of 740,210 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 740,210 )
How can I increase my downloads?