Is Freudian Psychoanalytic Theory Pseudo-Scientific by Karl Popper's Criterion of Demarcation?

American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (2):131 - 141 (1979)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,711
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    M. Hark (2002). Between Autobiography and Reality: Popper's Inductive Years. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):75-100.
    John Preston (1994). Methodology, Epistemology and Conventions: Popper's Bad Start. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:314 - 322.
    A. A. Derksen (1993). The Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 24 (1):17 - 42.
    Michael Ruse (1977). Karl Popper's Philosophy of Biology. Philosophy of Science 44 (4):638-661.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-05-29

    Total downloads

    39 ( #29,908 of 551,055 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    4 ( #19,303 of 551,055 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums