International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):465 - 490 (2011)
|Abstract||Abstract In ?Beyond the Myth of the Myth: A Kantian Theory of Non-Conceptual Content?, Robert Hanna argues for a very strong kind of non-conceptualism, and claims that this kind of non-conceptualism originally has been developed by Kant. But according to ?Kant?s Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects and the Gap in the B Deduction?, Kant?s non-conceptualism poses a serious problem for his argument for the objective validity of the categories, namely the problem that there is a gap in the B Deduction. This gap is that the B Deduction goes through only if conceptualism is true, but Kant is a non-conceptualist. In this paper, I will argue, contrary to what Hanna claims, that there is not a gap in the B Deduction|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Hanna (2011). Kant's Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and The Gap in the B Deduction. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):399 - 415.
Robert Hanna (2011). The Myth of the Given and the Grip of the Given. Diametros 27:25-46.
Brady Bowman (2011). A Conceptualist Reply to Hanna's Kantian Non-Conceptualism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):417 - 446.
Dennis Schulting (2012). Kant, Non-Conceptual Content, and the 'Second Step' of the B-Deduction. Kant Studies Online:51-92.
Michael Barker (2001). The Proof Structure of Kant's a-Deduction. Kant-Studien 92 (3):259-282.
Terry F. Godlove (2011). Hanna, Kantian Non-Conceptualism, and Benacerraf's Dilemma. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):447 - 464.
Dennis Schulting (2012). Kant's Deduction and Apperception. Palgrave Macmillan.
Nathan Bauer (2010). Kant's Subjective Deduction. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):433-460.
Anil Gomes (2010). Is Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose? Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Dennis Schulting (2012). Kant's Deduction and Apperception. Explaining the Categories. Palgrave Macmillan.
Curtis Bowman (2003). A Deduction of Kant's Concept of the Highest Good. Journal of Philosophical Research 28:45-63.
A. B. Dickerson (2003). Kant on Representation and Objectivity. Cambridge University Press.
Dennis Schulting (2012). Kant's Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories. Palgrave Macmillan.
Aaron M. Griffith (2010). Perception and the Categories: A Conceptualist Reading of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):193-222.
Added to index2011-09-09
Total downloads42 ( #26,949 of 548,974 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,273 of 548,974 )
How can I increase my downloads?