Is the method of bold conjectures and attempted refutations justifiably the method of science?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (2):105-136 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
205 (#94,707)

6 months
27 (#108,043)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adolf Grunbaum
Last affiliation: University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Ad hoc auxiliary hypotheses and falsificationism.Adolf Grünbaum - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (4):329-362.
Resurrecting logical probability.James Franklin - 2001 - Erkenntnis 55 (2):277-305.
A Tale of Three Theories: Feyerabend and Popper on Progress and the Aim of Science.Luca Tambolo - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51:33-41.
The Problem of Unconceived Objections.Moti Mizrahi - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (4):425-436.
Karl Popper.Stephen Thornton - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.
Objective Knowledge.K. R. Popper - 1972 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 4 (2):388-398.

View all 20 references / Add more references