Erkenntnis 70 (1):81 - 99 (2009)
|Abstract||It is argued that one can learn from minimal economic models. Minimal models are models that are not similar to the real world, do not resemble some of its features, and do not adhere to accepted regularities. One learns from a model if constructing and analysing the model affects one’s confidence in hypotheses about the world. Economic models, I argue, are often assessed for their credibility. If a model is judged credible, it is considered to be a relevant possibility. Considering such relevant possibilities may affect one’s confidence in necessity or impossibility hypotheses. Thus, one can learn from minimal economic models.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tarja Knuuttila (2009). Isolating Representations Versus Credible Constructions? Economic Modelling in Theory and Practice. Erkenntnis 70 (1):59 - 80.
Greg Hjorth (1996). On ℵ1 Many Minimal Models. Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (3):906 - 919.
Steven Rappaport (2001). Economic Models as Mini-Theories. Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (2):275-285.
Steven Rappaport (1995). Economic Models and Historical Explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (4):421-441.
Till Grüne‐Yanoff & Paul Schweinzer (2008). The Roles of Stories in Applying Game Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (2):131-146.
Saharon Shelah (1978). On the Number of Minimal Models. Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (3):475-480.
Julian Reiss (2012). The Explanation Paradox. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (1):43-62.
Robert Sugden (2000). Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical Models in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (1):1-31.
Nancy Cartwright (2009). If No Capacities Then No Credible Worlds. But Can Models Reveal Capacities? Erkenntnis 70 (1):45 - 58.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #50,393 of 556,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?