The falsihability of the lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction hypothesis: A rejoinder to professor Dingle

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,999
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Herbert Dingle (1959). The Falsifiability of the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction Hypothesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):228-229.
Dennis Dieks (1984). The “Reality” of the Lorentz Contraction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 15 (2):330-342.
Adolf Grünbaum (1961). Professor Dingle on Falsifiability: A Second Rejoinder. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (46):153-156.
Adolf Grūnbaum (1961). Professor Dingle on Falsifiability: A Second Rejoinder. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (46):153-156.
Herbert Dingle (1961). A Reply to Professor Grünbaum's Rejoinder. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (46):156-157.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2010-09-02

Total downloads

0

Recent downloads (6 months)

0

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.