Defending thought theory from a make-believe threat
British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (3):309-312 (1996)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJordan B. Peterson & Colin G. DeYoung (2000). Metaphoric Threat is More Real Than Real Threat. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):992-993.
Michelle Mason (2005). Hume and Humeans on Practical Reason. Hume Studies 31 (2):347-378.
Kathleen Emmett (1989). Slips of the Tongue. Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):203-222.
Sophie Desjardins & Antonio Zadra (2006). Is the Threat Simulation Theory Threatened by Recurrent Dreams? Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2):470-474.
Anne Germain, Tore A. Nielsen, Antonio Zadra & Jacques Montplaisir (2000). The Prevalence of Typical Dream Themes Challenges the Specificity of the Threat Simulation Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):940-941.
Kevan Edwards (2009). Referring When Push-Comes-to-Shove. In Sarah Sawyer (ed.), New Waves in Philosophy of Language. Palgrave Macmillan.
Simon Kirchin (2000). Quasi-Realism, Sensibility Theory, and Ethical Relativism. Inquiry 43 (4):413 – 427.
Hans Moravec (1999). Simulation, Consciousness, Existence. Intercommunication 28:98-112.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,230 of 550,802 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,802 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
