David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1997)
Responsible citizens are expected to combine ethical judgement with judiciously exercised social activism to preserve the moral foundation of democratic society and prevent political injustice. But do they? Utilizing a research model integrating insights from rational choice theory and cognitive developmental psychology this book carefully explores three exemplary cases of morally inspired activism: Jewish rescue in wartime Europe, abortion politics in the United States, and peace and settler activism in Israel. From all three analyses a single conclusion emerges: the most politically competent individuals are, most often, the least morally competent. This is the central paradox of political morality. These findings cast doubt on strong models of political morality characterized by enlightened moral reasoning and concerted political action while affirming alternative weak models that fuse activism with sectarian moral interests. They provide empirical support to further upend the liberal vision of democratic character, education, and society.
|Keywords||Political ethics Political activists|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$2.32 used (98% off) $82.45 new (7% off) $86.45 direct from Amazon (2% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||JA79.G73 1997|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Chiharu Ishida (2006). How Do Scores of DIT and MJT Differ? A Critical Assessment of the Use of Alternative Moral Development Scales in Studies of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (1):63 - 74.
Chiharu Ishida (2006). How Do Scores of DIT and MJT Differ? A Critical Assessment of the Use of Alternative Moral Development Scales in Studies of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (1):63-74.
Gian Luca Casali (2011). Developing a Multidimensional Scale for Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (4):485-497.
Michael L. Gross (2001). Medical Ethics Education: To What Ends? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (4):387-397.
Marcelo Svirsky (2010). Defining Activism. Deleuze Studies 4 (supplement):163-182.
Similar books and articles
Mika LaVaque-Manty (2002). Arguments and Fists: Political Agency and Justification in Liberal Theory. Routledge.
Craig L. Carr (2010). Liberalism and Pluralism: The Politics of E Pluribus Unum. Palgrave Macmillan.
Roman Altshuler (2009). Political Realism and Political Idealism: The Difference That Evil Makes. Public Reason 1 (2):73-87.
Emmanuel Adegbite, Kenneth Amaeshi & Olufemi Amao (2012). The Politics of Shareholder Activism in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (3):389-402.
Steven Lukes (1991). Moral Conflict and Politics. Clarendon Press.
Gayil Talshir (2005). The Intellectual as a Political Actor? Four Models of Theory/Praxis. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (2):209-224.
Christopher McMahon (2009). Reasonable Disagreement: A Theory of Political Morality. Cambridge University Press.
Sidney G. Tarrow (2005). The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge University Press.
Archon Fung (2005). Deliberation Before the Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World. Political Theory 33 (3):397 - 419.
Lee Wentz (2004). Ethics and Activism: The Theory and Practice of Political Morality. Philosophia 31 (3-4):589-596.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #238,008 of 1,938,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #294,284 of 1,938,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?