David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):525-552 (2011)
Nanotechnologies are enabling technologies which rely on the manipulation of matter on the scale of billionths of a metre. It has been argued that scientific uncertainties surrounding nanotechnologies and the inability of regulatory agencies to keep up with industry developments mean that voluntary regulation will play a part in the development of nanotechnologies. The development of technological applications based on nanoscale science is now increasingly seen as a potential test case for new models of regulation based on future-oriented responsibility, lifecycle risk management, and upstream public engagement. This article outlines findings from a project undertaken in 2008–2009 for the UK Government’s Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) by BRASS at Cardiff University, involving an in-depth survey both of current corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting in the UK nanotechnologies industry, and of attitudes to particular stakeholder issues within the industry. The article analyses the results to give an account of the nature of corporate social performance (CSP) within the industry, together with the particular model of CSR operating therein (‘do no harm’ versus ‘positive social force’). It is argued that the nature of emerging technologies requires businesses to adopt particular visions of CSR in order to address stakeholder issues, and that the nanotechnologies industry presents specific obstacles and opportunities in this regard
|Keywords||nanotechnology CSR CSP stakeholder engagement uncertainty risk innovation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2005). Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):137 - 148.
Craig Cormick (2009). Why Do We Need to Know What the Public Thinks About Nanotechnology? Nanoethics 3 (2):167-173.
S. O. Funtowicz & J. R. Ravetz (1990). Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Christopher Groves (2009). Nanotechnology, Contingency and Finitude. Nanoethics 3 (1):1-16.
Citations of this work BETA
Raul Gouvea, Jonathan D. Linton, Manuel Montoya & Steven T. Walsh (2012). Emerging Technologies and Ethics: A Race-to-the-Bottom or the Top? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):553-567.
Louis Y. Y. Lu, Bruce J. Y. Lin, John S. Liu & Chang-Yung Yu (2012). Ethics in Nanotechnology: What's Being Done? What's Missing? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):583-598.
Regan Stinnett (2012). Nanotechnology Policy and Education. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):551-552.
Caroline Gauthier & Corine Genet (2013). Nanotechnologies and Green Knowledge Creation: Paradox or Enhancer of Sustainable Solutions? Journal of Business Ethics:1-13.
Jonathan D. Linton & Steven T. Walsh (2012). Introduction to the Field of Nanotechnology Ethics and Policy. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):547-549.
Similar books and articles
Paul C. Godfrey, Nile A. Hatch & Jared M. Hansen (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:112-117.
Jennifer Kuzma & Aliya Kuzhabekova (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Oversight. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (4):407-419.
Michael J. Maloni & Michael E. Brown (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain: An Application in the Food Industry. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 68 (1):35 - 52.
Guido Palazzo & Ulf Richter (2005). CSR Business as Usual? The Case of the Tobacco Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 61 (4):387 - 401.
Diana C. Robertson & Nigel Nicholson (1996). Expressions of Corporate Social Responsibility in U.K. Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (10):1095 - 1106.
Hoje Jo & Maretno A. Harjoto (2012). The Causal Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (1):53-72.
Junwei Shi, Haiyan Fu & Lijun Hu (2007). Social Responsibility, Social Capital, and Corporate Competitive Advantage in Transitional China. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:377-394.
Edmund F. Byrne (2007). Assessing Arms Makers' Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (3):201 - 217.
Po-Keung Ip (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility and Crony Capitalism in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 79 (1/2):167 - 177.
Gary Fooks, Anna Gilmore, Jeff Collin, Chris Holden & Kelley Lee (2013). The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):283-299.
Michael L. Barnett (2005). Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:287-292.
Diana C. Robertson (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and Different Stages of Economic Development: Singapore, Turkey, and Ethiopia. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):617 - 633.
Gerard I. J. M. Zwetsloot (2003). From Management Systems to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):201 - 207.
Duygu Turker (2009). Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: A Scale Development Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):411 - 427.
Vladimir Petkoski (2007). From International Corporate Responsibility to Local CSR. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:283-295.
Added to index2011-07-25
Total downloads3 ( #224,136 of 1,089,057 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?