David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Argumentation 16 (3):277-286 (2002)
This paper responds to two aspects of Ralph Johnson's Manifest Rationality (2000). The first is his critique of deductivism. The second is his failure to make room for some species of argument (e.g., visual and kisceral arguments) proposed by recent commentators. In the first case, Johnson holds that argumentation theorists have adopted a notion of argument which is too narrow. In the second, that they have adopted one which is too broad. I discuss the case Johnson makes for both claims, and possible objections to his analysis
|Keywords||deductivism formal deductive logic kisceral arguments natural language deductivism Ralph Johnson the metaphysics of argument visual arguments|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Qingyin Liang & Yun Xie (2011). How Critical is the Dialectical Tier? Argumentation 25 (2):229-242.
David Hitchcock (2002). The Practice of Argumentative Discussion. Argumentation 16 (3):287-298.
Hans Vilhelm Hansen (2002). An Exploration of Johnson's Sense of ÂArgumentâ. Argumentation 16 (3):263-276.
Robert T. Pennock (1996). Naturalism, Evidence and Creationism: The Case of Phillip Johnson. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 11 (4):543-559.
Donald T. Siebert Jr (1975). Johnson and Hume on Miracles. Journal of the History of Ideas 36:543 - 547.
Andrew Aberdein (2011). The Dialectical Tier of Mathematical Proof. In Frank Zenker (ed.), Argumentation: Cognition & Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18--21, 2011. OSSA.
James E. Force (1982). Hume and Johnson on Prophecy and Miracles: Historical Context. Journal of the History of Ideas 43:463 - 476.
Peter van Inwagen (2009). Some Remarks on the Modal Ontological Argument. Philo 12 (2):217-227.
Jan Albert Laar (2013). J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson (Eds): Conductive Argument: An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning. [REVIEW] Argumentation 27 (3):337-344.
Antonio Marturano (2002). The Role of Metaethics and the Future of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (1):71-78.
David H. Sanford (1972). Begging the Question. Analysis 32 (6):197-199.
S. L. Zabell (1996). Confirming Universal Generalizations. Erkenntnis 45 (2-3):267 - 283.
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads6 ( #202,005 of 1,098,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #287,052 of 1,098,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?