Persuasion and peer review in science: Habermas's ideal speech situation applied

History of the Human Sciences 3 (2):195-209 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Freedom of communicative action.Lawrence B. Solum - 1989 - Northwestern University Law Review 83 (1):54-135.
The principles and practices of Peer review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Bias in Peer Review.Carole J. Lee, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Guo Zhang & Blaise Cronin - 2013 - Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (1):2-17.
A Critique of Habermas' Diskursethik.Alessandro Ferrara - 1985 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1985 (64):45-74.
Argumentation as Rational Persuasion.J. Anthony Blair - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):71-81.
Peer review: Selecting the best science. [REVIEW]Wendy Baldwin & Belinda Seto - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):11-17.
Peer review and innovation.Raymond Spier - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):99-108.
Argumentación y demostración.Alfonso Cabanzo - 2010 - Logos: Revista de la Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades 17:171-185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
135 (#132,940)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan G. Gross
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations