Graduate studies at Western
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (4):507 - 553 (2004)
|Abstract||When a debate seems intractable, with little agreement as to how one might proceed towards a resolution, it is understandable that philosophers should consider whether something might be amiss with the debate itself. Famously in the last century, philosophers of various stripes explored in various ways the possibility that at least certain philosophical debates are in some manner deficient in sense. Such moves are no longer so much in vogue. For one thing, the particular ways they have been made have themselves undergone much critical scrutiny, so that many philosophers now feel that there is, for example, a Quinean response to Carnap, a Gricean reply to Austin, and a diluting proliferation of Wittgenstein interpretations.2 Be that as it may,3 there do of..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Anders Öberg (2011). Hilary Putnam on Meaning and Necessity. Dissertation, Uppsala University
Christopher Norris (2002). Hilary Putnam: Realism, Reason, and the Uses of Uncertainty. Distributed in the U.S. By Palgrave.
Hilary Putnam (2004). Ethics Without Ontology. Harvard University Press.
Thomas Baldwin (2001). Contemporary Philosophy: Philosophy in English Since 1945. Oxford University Press.
Mauro Dorato (2008). Putnam on Time and Special Relativity: A Long Journey From Ontology to Ethics. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 4 (2):51-70.
Hilary Putnam (2008). Wittgenstein and Realism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):3 – 16.
Mitchell O. Stokes (2007). Van Inwagen and the Quine-Putnam Indispensability Argument. Erkenntnis 67 (3):439 - 453.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #28,293 of 740,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,546 )
How can I increase my downloads?