Reporting Self-Made Errors: The Impact of Organizational Error-Management Climate and Error Type [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 117 (1):189-208 (2013)
|Abstract||We study how an organization’s error-management climate affects organizational members’ beliefs about other members’ willingness to report errors that they discover when chance of error detection by superiors and others is extremely low. An error-management climate, as a component of the organizational climate, is said to be “high” when errors are accepted as part of everyday life as long as they are learned from and not repeated. Alternatively, the error-management climate is said to be an “error averse” climate when discovery of errors invokes the laying of blame on those admitting to or found committing errors. We examine the effects of this error-management climate in a professional services environment where uncorrected errors may have severe consequences and discovery of work errors is crucial for organizational success. We find that error-management climate affects organizational members’ beliefs about what other members will report about discovered self-made errors, with a high error-management (versus error averse) climate leading to greater reporting willingness. We also find a significant interaction with a key contextual variable, error type (conceptual or calculation), that suggests the effect is more significant for conceptual errors than calculation errors. Our findings suggest that an organization’s error-management climate is an important factor in promoting ethical behavior of employees, especially junior employees, carrying out routine tasks whose failure to report errors discovered incidental to those tasks may have severe implications for their organizations|
|Keywords||Error reporting Self-discovered errors Organizational climate Error-management climate Auditors|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Deborah G. Mayo (1997). Error Statistics and Learning From Error: Making a Virtue of Necessity. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):212.
George A. Peters (2006). Human Error: Causes and Control. Crc/Taylor & Francis.
William P. Bechtel (1982). Two Common Errors in Explaining Biological and Psychological Phenomena. Philosophy of Science 49 (December):549-574.
Weihui Fu & Satish P. Deshpande (2012). Antecedents of Organizational Commitment in a Chinese Construction Company. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3):301-307.
Stephen Finlay (2011). Errors Upon Errors: A Reply to Joyce. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):535 - 547.
Richard Joyce (2011). The Error In 'The Error In The Error Theory'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):519-534.
Nassim N. Taleb, The Future Has Thicker Tails Than the Past: Model Error as Branching Counterfactuals.
Douglas Allchin (2001). Error Types. Perspectives on Science 9 (1):38-58.
Cheryl Rathert & Win Phillips (2010). Medical Error Disclosure Training: Evidence for Values-Based Ethical Environments. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 97 (3):491 - 503.
Giuseppe Primiero (forthcoming). A Taxonomy of Errors for Information Systems. Minds and Machines:1-25.
Kristin S. Shrader-Frechette (1990). Island Biogeography, Species-Area Curves, and Statistical Errors: Applied Biology and Scientific Rationality. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:447 - 456.
Bart Streumer (2011). Can We Believe the Error Theory? Philosophical Studies 154 (4):325 - 348.
Mohan Matthen & Edwin Levy (1984). Teleology, Error, and the Human Immune System. Journal of Philosophy 81 (7):351-372.
Chris Daly & David Liggins (2010). In Defence of Error Theory. Philosophical Studies 149 (2):209-230.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-10-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?