Graduate studies at Western
The Linguistic Review 24 (4):423-429 (2007)
|Abstract||In this note, I clarify the point of my paper “The Nature of Semantics: On Jackendoff’s Arguments” (NS) in light of Ray Jackendoff’s comments in his “Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The State of the Art.” Along the way, I amplify my remarks on unification|
|Keywords||semantics unification naturalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James H. Bunn (2000). The Syntax of Galileo: Reply to Ray Jackendoff. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 10 (1):137-147.
Ross W. Gayler (2006). Vector Symbolic Architectures Are a Viable Alternative for Jackendoff's Challenges. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):78-79.
Ralph D. Ellis (1996). Ray Jackendoff's Phenomenology of Language as a Refutation of the 'Appendage' Theory of Consciousness. Pragmatics and Cognition 4 (1):125-137.
Ray Jackendoff (1998). Why a Conceptualist View of Reference? A Reply to Abbott. Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (2):211-219.
Ray Jackendoff (1992). Parts and Boundaries. In Beth Levin & Steven Pinker (eds.), Lexical & Conceptual Semantics. Blackwell.
Ray S. Jackendoff (1983). Semantics And Cognition. Cambridge: Mit Press.
Ray S. Jackendoff (1985). Information is in the Mind of the Beholder. Linguistics and Philosophy 8 (February):23-33.
James Higginbotham (2003). Jackendoff's Conceptualism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):680-681.
Added to index2009-04-22
Total downloads54 ( #22,532 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)25 ( #5,024 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?