Semantic analysis of wh-complements

Linguistics and Philosophy 5 (2):175 - 233 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of wh-complements in Montague Grammar. We will be concerned primarily with semantics, though some remarks on syntax are made in Section 4. Questions and wh-comple ments in Montague Grammar have been studied in Hamblin (1976), Bennett (1979), Karttunen (1977) and Hauser (1978) among others. These proposals will not be discussed explicitly, but some differences with Karttunen's analysis will be pointed out along the way

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
359 (#53,979)

6 months
151 (#20,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Martin Stokhof
University of Amsterdam
Jeroen Groenendijk
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

Why Suspend Judging?Jane Friedman - 2017 - Noûs 51 (2):302-326.
Know-how as Competence. A Rylean Responsibilist Account.David Löwenstein - 2017 - Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
A Preference Semantics for Imperatives.William B. Starr - 2020 - Semantics and Pragmatics 20.
Question‐directed attitudes.Jane Friedman - 2013 - Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1):145-174.

View all 90 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Syntax and semantics of questions.Lauri Karttunen - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (1):3--44.
Montague Grammar.Barbara H. Partee - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (5):278-312.
Tense logic and standard logic.Johan Fak van Benthem - 1977 - Logique Et Analyse 20 (80):41-83.
Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics.Peter Lamarque - 1976 - Philosophical Quarterly 26 (105):379-382.
Semantics of wh-complements.J. A. G. Groenendijk & M. J. B. Stokhof - 1981 - In Jeroen Groenendijk (ed.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language. U of Amsterdam. pp. 153-181.

View all 6 references / Add more references