David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In the Nineties, the existence of a "spirit of cooperation" between the Court of Justice and the national courts was thoroughly discussed by the doctrine in the light of the preliminary ruling procedure and the requirements of admissibility. But what is the situation nowadays? Is the spirit still there? Is it still the same? And if yes, is it stronger? This article examines the extent of this cooperation having in mind the Lisbon Treaty, the resolution of the European Parliament on the role of the national courts in the European judicial system (July 2008) and the recent Court of Justice case law. Also, it has the ambition to put the issue into the theoretical and more general context of discursive legal pluralism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shruti Rana, 'Streamlining' the Rule of Law: How the Department of Justice is Undermining Judicial Review of Agency Action.
Alexandr Svetlicinii, Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in the Republic of Moldova: Evolution of the Pro-Arbitration Policy in the Case Law of the Supreme Court of Justice.
Michal Bobek, On the Application of European Law in (Not Only) the Courts of the New Member States: 'Don't Do as I Say'?
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #145,782 of 1,100,751 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #289,565 of 1,100,751 )
How can I increase my downloads?