David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sociological Theory 23 (3):286-311 (2005)
This essay challenges those strains of contemporary social theory that regard romantic/sexual intimacy as a premier site of detraditionalization in the late modern era. Striking changes have occurred in intimacy and family life over the last half-century, but the notion of detraditionalization as currently formulated does not capture them very well. With the goal of achieving a more refined understanding, the article proposes a distinction between "regulative" and "meaning-constitutive" traditions. The former involve threats of exclusion from various moral communities; the latter involve linguistic and cultural frameworks within which sense is made of the world. Focusing on the U.S. case and marshaling various kinds of empirical evidence, the article argues that while the regulative tradition of what it terms lifelong, internally stratified marriage has declined in strength in recent years, the image of the form of couplehood inscribed in this regulative tradition continues to function as a hegemonic ideal in many American intimate relationships. Intimacy in the United States also remains beholden to the tradition of romantic love. That these meaning-constitutive traditions continue to play a central role in structuring contemporary intimacy suggests that detraditionalization involves the relative decline only of certain regulative traditions, a point that calls into question some of the normative assessments that often accompany the detraditionalization thesis
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kalynne Hackney Pudner (2007). “Comment Me Back”: Expectations of Intimacy in the Culture of Blog. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):65-71.
Diane Jeske (2001). Friendship and Reasons of Intimacy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):329-346.
Alessandro Tomasi (2007). Technology and Intimacy in the Philosophy of Georges Bataille. Human Studies 30 (4):411 - 428.
Robert Lipkin (1989). Intimacy and Confidentiality in Psychotherapeutic Relationships. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (4).
Samuel P. Winch (1996). Moral Justifications for Privacy and Intimacy. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 11 (4):197 – 209.
R. S. M. Patricia C. Flynn (2007). Honesty and Intimacy in Kant's Duty of Friendship. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):417-424.
Patricia C. Flynn (2007). Honesty and Intimacy in Kant's Duty of Friendship. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):417-424.
Lisa Gerber (2001). The Art of Intimacy. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (2):79-83.
Robert Strikwerda & Larry May (1992). Male Friendship and Intimacy. Hypatia 7 (2):110 - 125.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #25,369 of 1,096,804 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,973 of 1,096,804 )
How can I increase my downloads?