David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 13 (4):295-303 (1994)
The self-interest paradigm predicts that unethical behavior occurs when such behavior benefits the actor. A recent model of lying behavior, however, predicts that lying behavior results from an individual''s inability to meet conflicting role demands. The need to reconcile the self-interest and role conflict theories prompted the present study, which orthogonally manipulated the benefit from lying and the conflicting role demands. A model integrating the two theories predicts the results, which showed that both elements — self benefit and role conflict — influenced lying, separately and interactively. Additionally, the relative strength of the roles in conflict affected their level of influence. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard E. Nisbett & Timothy D. Wilson (1977). Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review 84 (3):231-59.
Martin Fishbein & Icek Ajzen (1977). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Philosophy and Rhetoric 10 (2):130-132.
D. M. Randall & A. M. Gibson (1990). Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 9 (6):457 - 471.
Linda Klebe Trevino (1992). Experimental Approaches to Studying Ethical-Unethical Behavior in Organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (2):121-136.
Citations of this work BETA
Nicole Andreoli & Joel Lefkowitz (2009). Individual and Organizational Antecedents of Misconduct in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):309 - 332.
Neil Granitz & Dana Loewy (2007). Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 72 (3):293 - 306.
Jennifer Kish-Gephart, James Detert, Linda Klebe Treviño, Vicki Baker & Sean Martin (2013). Situational Moral Disengagement: Can the Effects of Self-Interest Be Mitigated? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 125 (2):1-19.
Christopher J. Robertson, Anna Lamin & Grigorios Livanis (2010). Stakeholder Perceptions of Offshoring and Outsourcing: The Role of Embedded Issues. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 95 (2):167 - 189.
Neil Granitz & Dana Loewy (2007). Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism. Journal of Business Ethics 72 (3):293-306.
Similar books and articles
H. M. Malm (1989). Commodification or Compensation: A Reply to Ketchum. Hypatia 4 (3):128-135.
Peter J. Taylor (1994). Shifting Frames: From Divided to Distributed Psychologies of Scientific Agents. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304-310.
J. L. Schellenberg (2005). The Hiddenness Argument Revisited. Religious Studies 41 (3):287-303.
P. X. Monaghan (2010). A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms. Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
H. E. Baber (1987). How Bad Is Rape? Hypatia 2 (2):125-138.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #163,670 of 1,790,126 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #265,702 of 1,790,126 )
How can I increase my downloads?